Client: Private limited liability company Industry: Medical supplier Two entrepreneurs who started out as friends now wanted to go their separate ways. One of them wanted to pursue the joint ICT service branch while the other preferred the joint trade branch. The structure had to be divided...
Client: Insurer Industry: Pharmacies A civil law notary failed to remind his client of the effect of a mandatory offer of shares (also) in case of an internal change of control. The client was under the obligation to offer his shares for sale, and held the civil...
Client: private limited liability company Industry: ICT – (B-to-B) servicing and support Over the years, two young entrepreneurs had become not just business partners but friends as well. One of them now wanted to try his luck elsewhere, and they decided to severe their business ties. Commercially...
Client: Claimant Industry: Dental Care The court held a patent holder liable for damages to the claimant’s exploitation company. The claimant asked Nederhof to compute its loss of money flows. A complex matter, in particular because although all parties regarded the exploitation of the care product in...
Client: Insurer Industry: Estate agency (property) Entrepreneur (in a former general partnership) disputed the business’s value after the matrimonial property had been divided. The civil law notary who was the party-appointed advisor, and responsible for drawing up the divorce settlement, was held liable as he had allegedly...
Client: Brother # 3 (minority shareholder) Industry: Retail (fish) Family business, in which father’s shares were transferred to his three sons. Two of the brothers were working in the smoke house and real estate, while the third brother was in charge of sales and hospitality. After years...
Client: Director also Holder of Call Option Industry: Hospitality (international) Director of a large hospitality group with international ambitions and locations would like to exercise and capitalize his call-option because of ‘incompatible characters’ and differences of opinion (on strategy and management) with his co-director (also sole shareholder)....
Client: Remaining partners Industry: Greenhouse horticulture - vegetables Two general partnerships of three limited liability companies were engaged in the packaging and sale of tomatoes. The two major partners decided to suspend the third partner and ultimately terminate the partnership. The third partner contested their decision, as...
Client: Minority shareholder through legal counsel Industry: Timber Following a familial dispute two brothers (shareholders 1 and 2) made a proposal to buy out their third brother (shareholder 3) from the family business. The brothers managed a timber yard and commercial real property (structured via several private...
Client: Minority shareholder Industry: Architects Nederhof helped reach an amicable settlement, averting the risk of an employment conflict between the company and its director that could have resulted in the compulsory offer by the director of a share package. On behalf of its client Nederhof – by...